Wednesday, July 24, 2013

Regional Plan Association Endorses NYC Council Vote To Give MSG 10 More Years ....


Is this email not displaying correctly?
View it in your browser.
Dear Friends,

We are excited to share the news that the New York City Council voted today to allow Madison Square Garden to remain in its current location above Penn Station for 10 more years. This historic decision paves the way for the city to find a new home for the Garden in Manhattan and to remake Penn Station into a world-class transit hub.
As Council Speaker Christine Quinn noted before the vote, New York should have a 21st century transportation hub worthy of the greatest city in the world, and significantly improving Penn Station while Madison Square Garden sits atop it has proven to be an intractable problem. Identifying a new home for Madison Square Garden in Manhattan is crucial to creating a transit gateway that can accommodate our growing region and sustain Midtown’s economic vitality.

Some half a million commuters and visitors pass through Penn Station every weekday. They face severe overcrowding, grim corridors and confusing, shabby public areas. The New York metropolitan region has endured this depressing state of affairs for half a century. With today's vote, residents of the metropolitan region can begin envisioning the day when their commutes no longer start or end in misery, when the nation's busiest transit hub also is a welcoming civic space, and when the station and the arena bring new life to the surrounding community.
The Alliance for a New Penn Station, a consortium of civic groups, businesses and individuals founded by Regional Plan Association and Municipal Art Society, looks forward to supporting the process of relocating Madison Square Garden, rebuilding Penn Station and revitalizing west Midtown.

Sincerely,


Robert D. Yaro

President
Regional Plan Association is America's oldest and most distinguished independent urban research and advocacy group. RPA prepares long range plans and policies to guide the growth and development of the New York- New Jersey-Connecticut metropolitan region. RPA also provides leadership on national infrastructure, sustainability, and competitiveness concerns. RPA enjoys broad support from the region's and nation's business, philanthropic, civic, and planning communities.
For more information visit www.rpa.org
Copyright © 2013 Regional Plan Association, All rights reserved.
You signed up to receive Spotlight on the Region and Regional Plan Association updates on research, events and news.

Our mailing address is:
Regional Plan Association
4 Irving Place, Suite 711-S
New YorkNew York 10003

Add us to your address book
 
Regional Plan Association

Senator Reverend Ruben Diaz 'WHAT YOU SHOULD KNOW' ....


WHAT YOU SHOULD KNOW
By Senator Rev. Rubén Díaz
32nd Senatorial District, Bronx County, New York
Tel. 718-991-3161

THE HYPOCRISY OF SOME NY STATE SENATORS

You  should  know  that  I  have  received a copy of a letter that has been
passed around to all Democratic senators to sign and to be sent to New York
State Governor Andrew Cuomo.

The letter in question starts by stating: “The 421-a program was created to
spur   residential   housing   construction   in   economically  struggling
neighborhoods.”   However,  as  a  recent  Daily  News  editorial  headline
accurately  stated,  “Apartments  for  billionaires  should  not be getting
taxpayer handouts.”

"News that omnibus housing legislation passed this year that restored co-op
and  condo  tax breaks and offered critical relief to homeowners struggling
after  Hurricane Sandy also contained wildly inappropriate tax breaks for 5
ultra-luxury buildings has generated widespread and justified outrage.”

You  should  know that some of the same senators that are asking me to join
them in signing the letter, are the same ones who did not want to listen to
me,  and went ahead and voted in favor of the legislation that now, because
of the Daily News editorial, want to appear “Clean and Honest.”

You  should know that on January 23rd, 2013, that piece of legislation came
to  the  floor  of the senate. The legislation, S.2320 sponsored by Senator
Martin  Golden,  was  debated  and  everyone got the opportunity to express
their opinions in favor or against the piece of legislation. I took my time
speaking  against  it  and asked my fellow senators to vote “NO”. Only 6 of
all  the  Democrats  heard  my call and voted no; they are: Senator Adriano
Espaillat,  Senator  Terry  Gibson,  Senator  Bill  Perkins, Senator Marcos
Serrano, Senator Gustavo Rivera and Senator Cecilia Tkaczyk, the rest voted
in favor of Bill S.2320.

Today I am including a copy of my speech on the Senate floor on January 23,
2013  expressing  my  opposition  to  the legislation in which I criticized
Senator Liz  Krueger for her vote in favor of the legislation.

My complete speech during that day goes as follows:

“Senator Krueger, I just love you. I love you so much. You know, I love you
for  keeping  me  one hour listening to you talking bad about a bill and at
the end saying "I'm voting yes." I love you. I love you.


Mr.  President  and  ladies and gentlemen, once in a while I write a column
called  "What  You  Should Know," It’s my way to inform my constituents and
the voters of New York of what's going on.


Today,  I wrote one. And I call it, based on the Roman Empire old saying, I
entitled it "Caesar's wife should not only be pure but should also have the
appearance of purity." And by voting for this bill, we  might be sending an
appearance  of  impurity, because this bill only benefits the rich. It is a
multi-million  program  of  rent  exemption and abatement for landlords who
renovate their buildings.


This  piece  of  legislation, ladies and gentlemen, does nothing to protect
and  strengthen  tenant protection. So tenants in the City of New York will
not  be  protected  with  this  bill. On the contrary, they might be put in
danger. It is just a tax benefit to developers producing luxury buildings.


This  bill, ladies and gentlemen -- and I'm so sorry that Liz Krueger voted
for  it -- this bill does nothing to prevent landlords from double-dipping.
That's  a  word  that -- a nice word, double-dipping. Meaning that a lot of
them  are  receiving  a J-51 tax credit from the government and at the same
time  will  be  increasing  the  tenants'  rent  based  on  a major capital
improvement.  So  this  bill  will  allow  landlords  to get money from the
government for the renovation based on J-51 and at the same time will allow
landlords  to  increase  tenants'  rents  based  on  something called major
capital improvement for the same renovation.


And  this  bill will extend 421-a tax benefits to the owners of 15 specific
plots in 22 Midtown and downtown Manhattan which are now being developed as
luxury  condominiums  and office buildings. Fifteen of them.  And according
to  the  New York Tenants and Neighbors Coalition,  it seems that only five
specific developer companies will benefit from this piece of legislation.


They  are  number  one,  Extell  Development  Company,  Extell  Development
Company,  for  their  billionaire tower, One57, Silverstein Properties, the
owner  of  the  World  Trade  Center. Thor Equities, the company behind the
controversial  Coney Island  redevelopment for 516-520 Fifth Avenue. Number
four, Steinhardt Management, who wants to develop two former Stock Exchange
buildings  in  Lower  Manhattan.  Number  five,  Shoreham {ph} Association,
Incorporated,  who  plans  to build a 30-story glass tower over the site of
the original New York Times building.


Ladies and gentlemen, these developments do nothing to address the New York
City ongoing affordable housing crisis. Therefore, to vote for this bill we
might  be sending a message, an impure message, that we're only working for
the  landlords  and  against the tenants and the regular people in New York
City.”


Now, after some of them voted in favor of that legislation, and reading The
New  York  Daily News Editorial they want Governor Cuomo to repeal it.  And
that ladies and gentlemen is pure hypocrisy.

This is Senator Rev. Rubén Díaz and this is what you should know.


SENATE VOTING RECORD

Floor Votes:

01/23/13 S2320 Senate Vote Aye: 56 Nay: 7



Senator Reverend Ruben Diaz Calls Out N.Y.POST For Ignorance & Insensitivity


July 24, 2013
Columnist John Podhoretz
New York Post 
Sent by email to: jpodhoretz@gmail.com 
Dear Mr. Podhoretz:
This letter is to express my disappointment in both Anthony Weiner’s use of “Carlos Danger” as his own nickname, and in your coverage that added insult to injury when you wrote in your column today “After all, there is no Hispanic candidate in the race.”
I have to believe that as a seasoned journalist who covers New York City politics, that you are aware of Erick Salgado, Erick Salgado is an official candidate in the Democratic Mayoral Primary who filed about 20,000 signatures to get on the ballot, who is Hispanic, and who, in fact, is the only Hispanic in this Democratic Mayoral primary.
Of course, like most Hispanics, I am insulted that Anthony Weiner chose a Hispanic name to denigrate us and mock us by masking his deep perversions, but I have to say that I am also insulted that the New York Post will not give New York Mayoral Candidate Erick Salgado – the real Hispanic – a fair chance to even be included in your coverage of the 2013 Democratic Primary.
I am calling on you and the New York Post to provide a fair analysis of this Race for Mayor in the Democratic Primary, and to stop ignoring Erick Salgado who is running a responsible and respectful campaign.
I am also calling on you and the New York Post to stop ignoring New York’s Hispanic community and the strong political leadership that continues to thrive throughout our City.
With 47 days left in this Democratic Primary, I am available to meet with you and your editorial board along with Erick Salgado to discuss these matters further.
Sincerely,
Senator Reverend Ruben Diaz